FRAMEWORKThe Audit Criteria
Every Interface Audit evaluates a site against the same framework: 167 criteria organized into 12 categories. Each finding in your report maps to a specific criterion, so you always know which standard a recommendation comes from.
167CRITERIA12CATEGORIESWCAGAA BASELINE
- Standard10 criteria · 1 categoryA published standard with testable success criteria, such as WCAG 2.1 AA.
- Established research36 criteria · 2 categoriesFindings from cognitive psychology and human-computer interaction replicated over decades.
- Heuristic37 criteria · 5 categoriesExpert rules of thumb such as Nielsen's usability heuristics: widely used, grounded in practice rather than controlled studies.
- Design pattern26 criteria · 3 categoriesConventions that work because users have learned them: platform guidance and common interface patterns.
- Emerging guidance58 criteria · 1 categoryRecent human-AI interaction guidelines and patterns: the youngest evidence in the framework, still being validated.
- FND-01Chunking
- FND-02Cognitive Load
- FND-03Mental Model
- FND-04Miller's Law
- FND-05Recognition Rather Than Recall
- FND-06Serial Position Effect
- FND-07Von Restorff Effect
- FND-08Working Memory
- FND-09Common Region
- FND-10Proximity
- FND-11Prägnanz
- FND-12Similarity
- FND-13Uniform Connectedness
- FND-14Selective Attention
- FND-15Figure-Ground Principle
- FND-16Law of Continuity
- FND-17Law of Closure
- FND-18Flow
- FND-19Goal-Gradient Effect
- FND-20Peak-End Rule
- FND-21Zeigarnik Effect
- FND-22Choice Overload
- FND-23Cognitive Bias
- FND-24Hick's Law
- FND-25Paradox of the Active User
- FND-26Parkinson's Law
- FND-27Pareto Principle (80/20 Rule)
- STD-01Consistency and Standards
- STD-02Design System Coherence Law
- STD-03Behavioral Consistency Law
- STD-04Match Between System and Real World
- STD-05Platform Convention Law
- STD-06Cross-Platform Consistency Law
- VIS-01Aesthetic and Minimalist Design
- VIS-02Visual Hierarchy Law
- VIS-03White Space Usage Law
- VIS-04Color Psychology Law
- VIS-05Typography System Law
- VIS-06Typography Hierarchy Law
- VIS-07Typography Accessibility Law
- VIS-08Dashboard Information Density Law
- VIS-09Data Storytelling Law
- CONT-01Aesthetic-Usability Effect
- CONT-02Jakob's Law
- CONT-03Occam's Razor
- CONT-04Postel's Law (Robustness Principle)
- CONT-05Tesler's Law (Conservation of Complexity)
- CONT-06Help and Documentation
- CONT-07Contextual Help Law
- CONT-08Self-Service Support Law
- CONT-09Progressive Disclosure
- CONT-10Information Scent Law
- CONT-11Categorization Psychology Law
- CONT-12Content Hierarchy Law
- NAV-01Mental Map Formation Law
- NAV-02Landmark Navigation Law
- NAV-03Path Optimization Law
- NAV-04Navigation Recovery Law
- NAV-05Search Query Formation Law
- NAV-06Search Result Relevance Law
- NAV-07Faceted Search Navigation Law
- INT-01Form Flow Optimization Law
- INT-02Input Validation Timing Law
- INT-03Error Prevention in Forms Law
- INT-04Form Completion Motivation Law
- INT-05Chart Type Selection Law
- INT-06Affordances Law
- INT-07Signifier Clarity Law
- INT-08Interface Metaphor Law
- INT-09Interface State Communication Law
- FB-01Visibility of System Status
- FB-02Feedback Loop Completion Law
- FB-03Progressive Feedback Law
- FB-04Error Communication Clarity Law
- ERR-01Error Prevention
- ERR-02Constraint-Based Prevention Law
- ERR-03Graceful Degradation Law
- ERR-04Error Recovery Guidance Law
- ERR-05Help Users Recognize, Diagnose, and Recover from Errors
- ERR-06Error Prevention Communication Law
- ERR-07Contextual Error Guidance Law
- CTRL-01User Control and Freedom
- CTRL-02Navigation Breadcrumb Law
- CTRL-03Escape Hatch Law
- CTRL-04Navigation Consistency Law
- CTRL-05Wayfinding Support Law
- CTRL-06Flexibility and Efficiency of Use
- CTRL-07Expert Pathway Law
- CTRL-08Customization Balance Law
- MOB-01Touch Target Sizing Law
- MOB-02Thumb Zone Optimization Law
- MOB-03Gesture Design Consistency Law
- MOB-04Mobile Navigation Hierarchy Law
- MOB-05Responsive Breakpoint Law
- MOB-06Doherty Threshold
- MOB-07Fitts's Law
- MOB-08Response Time Limits
- MOB-09Progressive Enhancement Law
- MOB-10Perceived Performance Law
- ACC-01Perceivable Principle (WCAG)
- ACC-02Operable Principle (WCAG)
- ACC-03Understandable Principle (WCAG)
- ACC-04Robust Principle (WCAG)
- ACC-05Ethical Design Principles
- ACC-06Dark Pattern Recognition
- ACC-07Persuasive Design Ethics
- ACC-08Empowering Design Principle
- ACC-09Finite Design Principle
- ACC-10Inclusive Wellbeing Principle
- AIX-01User Agency Preservation
- AIX-02Mixed-Initiative Optimal Balance
- AIX-03Hybrid Feedback Systems
- AIX-04Negative Feedback Loop Prevention
- AIX-05AI-Generated Component Validation
- AIX-06Cognitive Load Calibration in AI Interfaces
- AIX-07Cognitive Anchoring Preservation
- AIX-08Recognition Over Recall in Adaptive Navigation
- AIX-09Procedural Memory Protection
- AIX-10Automation Bias Prevention
- AIX-11Complementary Strengths Framework
- AIX-12AI Bias Transparency
- AIX-13Ethical AI Disclosure Layering
- AIX-14Conversational Turn-Taking
- AIX-15Optimal Suggestion Quantity
- AIX-16Confidence Indicator Display
- AIX-17Progressive AI Assistance Scaling
- AIX-18Conversational Flow Principle
- AIX-19Spatial Hierarchy Principle
- AIX-20AI Transparency Principle
- AIX-21Enterprise AI Governance
- AIX-22Enterprise AI Workflow Integration
- AIX-23Enterprise AI Compliance
- AIX-24AI Capability Disclosure
- AIX-25AI Accuracy Communication
- AIX-26Contextual AI Timing
- AIX-27Contextual AI Relevance
- AIX-28Cultural AI Norms
- AIX-29AI Bias Mitigation
- AIX-30Creative Agency Protection
- AIX-31Efficient AI Invocation
- AIX-32Efficient AI Dismissal
- AIX-33Efficient AI Correction
- AIX-34Graceful AI Ambiguity
- AIX-35AI Explainability
- AIX-36AI Conversation Memory
- AIX-37AI Personalization
- AIX-38Cautious AI Updates
- AIX-39Granular AI Feedback
- AIX-40AI Action Consequences
- AIX-41Global AI Controls
- AIX-42AI Change Notifications
- AIX-43AI Capability Discovery
- AIX-44AI Navigation Patterns
- AIX-45Contextual AI Help
- AIX-46AI Prompt Design
- AIX-47AI Input Flexibility
- AIX-48AI Context Capture
- AIX-49AI User Control
- AIX-50AI Boundary Setting
- AIX-51AI Audit Trails
- AIX-52AI Source Citations
- AIX-53AI Consistency & Reliability
- AIX-54AI Transparency Timing
- AIX-55AI Privacy Expectations
- AIX-56Agent Task Handoff
- AIX-57Agent Memory Patterns
- AIX-58Agent Collaboration
Each criterion is grounded in established UX research, usability heuristics, design patterns or accessibility standards, from cognitive load and Gestalt perception to WCAG 2.1 success criteria. The legend above says which is which. The framework is curated and maintained to keep audits consistent, explainable, and tied to a named basis rather than opinion.
- 01It does not replace usability testing, behavioral analytics, user interviews or strategic UX research. An automated scan sees the interface, not the people using it.
- 02Findings describe observable interface conditions and likely sources of friction. They do not establish user behavior or a causal business effect; impact figures are estimates.
- 03Accessibility checks detect what an automated tool can detect. They are not a WCAG conformance evaluation, which needs manual testing with keyboards, screen readers and real users.
- 04The Expert Review adds the human layer: context, prioritization and judgment that a scan cannot provide.
FREE. NO SIGNUP REQUIRED.See these criteria run on your site
Run a free audit and get prioritized findings, each mapped to the criterion it comes from.
Start Free Audit